• About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives
Angry Bear
Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
« Back

Open thread May 31, 2013

Dan Crawford | May 31, 2013 8:02 am

Tags: open thread Comments (3) | Digg Facebook Twitter |
3 Comments
  • rjs says:
    May 31, 2013 at 12:12 pm

    Robobee Officially Takes Flight: Robotic Pollinators to Replace Dying Bees

    it will be interesting to see if they can mass produce a half million of them for every dozen acres of oranges they want to pollinate…

  • coberly says:
    May 31, 2013 at 2:02 pm

    Rjs

    and if they can, it will be interesting to see how much we like the world they are creating.

  • Denis Drew says:
    June 9, 2013 at 12:29 pm

    EXPERIMENTING TO SEE IF MY WORKSHEET DISPLAYS PROPERLY ON AN OLD OPEN THREAD. THE DOTS ARE BECAUSE MY EXPERIENCE WITH TYPEPAD IS THAT IT WILL CLOSE UP OPEN SPACES — SO HERE GOES:

    My minimum wage worksheet — the easily could-have-been minimum wage dbl indexed for inflation and per capita income growth:

    yr..per capita…real…nominal…dbl-index…%-of

    68..15,473..10.69..(1.60)
    69-70-71-72-73
    74..18,284…9.43…(2.00)…12.61
    75..18,313…9.08…(2.10)…12.61
    76..18,945…9.40…(2.30)…13.04…72%
    77
    78..20,422…9.45…(2.65)…14.11
    79..20,696…9.29…(2.90)…14.32
    80..20,236…8.75…(3.10)…14.00

    81..20,112…8.57…(3.35)…13.89…62%
    82-83-84-85-86-87-88-89
    90..24,000…6.76…(3.80)…16.56
    91..23,540…7.26…(4.25)…16.24…44%
    92-93-94-95
    96..25,887…7.04…(4.75)…17.85
    97..26,884…7.46…(5.15)…19.02…39%
    98-99-00-01-02-03-04-05-06
    07..29,075…6.56…(5.85)…20.09
    08..28,166…7.07…(6.55)…19.45
    09..27,819…7.86…(7.25)…19.42…40%
    10-11-12

    13..29,209?.. 7.25..(7.25)…20.20?..36%?

    * * * * * *

    An added thought: By the year 2013 some could speculate that a $20.20/hr minimum wage might not be a realistic expectation evidenced by double indexing alone — from 1968’s $10.69/hr minimum wage — because the fabric of the economy might have changed so radically over 45 years. Fair enough, but LBJ’s 1968 minimum wage would have morphed to more than $14/hr with double indexing by only 1969. Can anyone explain how the economic fabric might have changed radically in a mere 10 years?

Featured Stories

Macron Bypasses Parliament With ‘Nuclear Option’ on Retirement Age Hike

Angry Bear

All Electric comes to Heavy Equipment

Daniel Becker

Medicare Plan Commissions May Steer Beneficiaries to Wrong Coverage

run75441

Thoughts on Silicon Valley Bank: Why the FDIC plan isn’t (but also is) a Bailout

NewDealdemocrat

Contributors

Dan Crawford
Robert Waldmann
Barkley Rosser
Eric Kramer
ProGrowth Liberal
Daniel Becker
Ken Houghton
Linda Beale
Mike Kimel
Steve Roth
Michael Smith
Bill Haskell
NewDealdemocrat
Ken Melvin
Sandwichman
Peter Dorman
Kenneth Thomas
Bruce Webb
Rebecca Wilder
Spencer England
Beverly Mann
Joel Eissenberg

Subscribe

Blogs of note

    • Naked Capitalism
    • Atrios (Eschaton)
    • Crooks and Liars
    • Wash. Monthly
    • CEPR
    • Econospeak
    • EPI
    • Hullabaloo
    • Talking Points
    • Calculated Risk
    • Infidel753
    • ACA Signups
    • The one-handed economist
Angry Bear
Copyright © 2023 Angry Bear Blog

Topics

  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics
  • US/Global Economics
  • Taxes/regulation
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Politics
  • Climate Change
  • Social Security
  • Hot Topics

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial
  • Policies
  • Archives