In response to this graphic in my reprised post from yesterday: Commenter rjs points us to this depressing Economist post — the government data source for this graphic has gone…

…that the Romney campaign said the Post confused outsoursing and offshoring because they wrote about outsourcing. I note and stress that this blatantly fallacious argument from the Romney campaign is…

…favor the wealthy–lowering corporate tax rates to half their current level, eliminating corporate tax entirely for manufacturers, eliminating corporate tax on overseas profits that are used to buy manufacturing equipment…

…set of health-care benefits. Purchasing medical treatments from the producers of health care, which includes determining the prices to be paid, claims processing for insured patients and controlling overall spending…

The comments section (js kit) is not registering correctly at the comment label but are actually being left…please click on comments to take you to the whole post page and…

…as part of the deficit reduction package. See Letter. Given that the very existence of too big to fail banks implies that the government will again have to come to…

…it honest to talk about inflated dollars without telling people that’s what you are doing and giving them a basis for understanding what the numbers mean in terms of the…

…from not getting that most peasants even in the strictest systems organized their economic life around consumption targets rather than growing net worth (say by acquiring more fields). You get…

…or six weeks. But it was just a guess to begin with.” Don’t get me wrong: I consider this the equivalent of the Bancroft family getting all uppity about how…

…I agree with Keynes – the data shows that expansions following recessions during which the government increased its spending are longer and stronger than when expansions following recessions during which…