…high income individuals will somehow encourage investment even as negative real interest rates have not fully succeeded. Isn’t this what the Reagan Administration argued some 30 years ago – which…

…the Clinton Administration far in excess of what had been seen under President Reagan, as a glance at their chart on p. 52 shows. Finally, the book has no index,…

…zero and so be temporary: “Reagan borrowed the money to pay for tax cuts, they NEED to pay it back”. Well actually under ideal circumstances they don’t need to pay…

…tend to get at lower pay compounding the difficulty of making enough money. Also mentioned is Ronald Reagan’s earned income credit to help alleviate what could have been much more…

…the Act passed by Congress. ACA is the Biggest Tax Ever? It does not even come close to the tax Truman passed to cover WWII costs or even the Reagan…

…by Lawrence Silberman, a Reagan appointee to the federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and one of the most respected (in conservative legal circles) federal appellate judges,…

…in history” (on an absolutely dollar basis, of course; no Republican currently in the party would admit that the largest percentage increase was under Ronald Wilson Reagan) include the fiscal…

…people named Reagan and Thatcher.) The problem is, what they’re saying isn’t true. Being a curiously curious cat, with an apparently blithe disregard for my own mortality, I went out…

…that when the top tax rate is 35%, cutting rates further will reduce tax revenue. “The Reagan tax cuts, on the whole, reduced revenue,” he explains. “The Bush tax cuts…

…tax rates have led to lower government revenues, says Alan Viard, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative policy group. “The Reagan tax cuts, on the whole, reduced…