Why We Should Not Get Excited Over Trump Deals
Pulling from the latest Krugman article in my email box. The country is on the road to nowhere economically. It is just one story after another which are supposed to convince us something wonderful is going to happen due to Trump deals.
Four months in and counting . . . A bit of Krugman keeping score.
“Will Trump Pretend to Fix What He Broke?”
The Trump administration is planning to announce its first trade deal today, with Britain. Except it won’t be a deal; more of a “deal.” Reportedly it will mainly be a “framework” for an actual deal that may or may not happen sometime in the future. This is the tariff equivalent of “concepts of a plan” for health care.
In other words, this will be smoke and mirrors, an attempt to persuade the gullible that Trump’s tariffs are actually working. Markets — driven by small investors who seem desperate to believe that the people in charge have some idea what they’re doing — may briefly bounce on the announcement.
Trump, however, has already declared that the tariff that really matters right now, the prohibitive 145 percent rate on imports from China, won’t be coming down. That tariff has already caused a 30-40 percent drop in the volume of US-China trade, which, given the time it takes to ship stuff, guarantees a sharp increase in consumer prices and possibly empty shelves a few weeks from now.
But back to that UK “deal.” Nobody knows what will eventually come out of it, but we can be sure of one thing: It won’t lead to any significant opening of the British market to U.S. goods. Why? Because that market was already wide open before Trump stomped in.
The most important thing to understand about Trump’s trade war is that it’s an attempt to solve a problem that only exists in his imagination. He keeps insisting that other countries are engaged in unfair trade, but the reality is that most of our important trading partners impose very low tariffs on U.S. products:
UK US Trade and Tariffs: Real Stats, NimbleFins
You could argue that China is less open to trade than the tariff number suggests, because the government plays such a large role in the Chinese economy. But for Britain, Canada and the European Union Trump’s tariffs are a huge, destructive attempt to fix something that wasn’t broken. These nations can’t stop doing bad stuff on trade because they weren’t doing bad stuff before Trump came along.
What about America’s trade deficit? As economists have repeated ad nauseam, this deficit doesn’t reflect unfair foreign trade policies. It is, instead, the flip side of large flows of capital into the United States, which historically reflected the fact that the U.S. was perceived as an attractive place to invest. Even if Trump manages to score some actual deals, as opposed to concepts of deals, they won’t change that logic. If his strategy does manage to reduce the trade deficit, it will do so only by destroying America’s attractiveness to foreign investors, which may be an achievable goal.
But let me go back to the point that Trump’s tariffs are a response to a problem that didn’t exist. That’s actually an observation that goes beyond trade policy. The Trump team likes to claim that it inherited an economy in terrible shape. Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, keeps claiming that the economy needs a “detox.”
In fact, however, when Trump took over the U.S. economy was in very good shape. Unemployment was around 4 percent, while inflation was at most a fraction of a percentage point above the Federal Reserve’s target of 2 percent. Our productivity growth was the envy of the world. We had a trade deficit, but as I said, this mainly reflected America’s attractiveness as a place to invest.
It’s true that Goldilocks now seems to be leaving the building, but that’s entirely — entirely — due to Trump himself. In discussing the Fed’s decision to leave interest rates unchanged, Jerome Powell repeatedly talked about “uncertainty,” but the only reason things seem much more uncertain now than they did a few months ago is the chaos Trump has created.
And stuff like this doesn’t help:
Actually, I’m baffled by the quotation marks around “eggs.”
Anyway, aside from the attempt to bully the Fed, you should be worried by Trump’s evident disconnect from reality. Prices are, in fact, going up, with a notable upturn in the inflation expected by businesses:
So what will Trump do if, as seems likely, Monday’s report on consumer prices shows the first signs of accelerating inflation? Even more important, what will he do when the cutoff of imports from China really hits consumers? There’s no chance that he will admit that he was wrong. There’s a very good chance that he and his minions will soon begin trying to corrupt the economic data.
So should we celebrate the trade deal that will be announced today? No. It won’t solve any of the problems Trump has created. It will, if anything, offer Trump the temporary illusion of success, encouraging him to create even more problems.




Prior to 1971, a trade deficit resulted in a foreign country’s claim against the gold reserves of the deficit nation. Of course no such claim exists today. Now it results in capital inflows much of which is buying treasury securities.
If anything the unfair trade policies of other nations has been a benefit for American consumers but not necessarily American businesses. That’s because foreign competition keeps prices down. It also forces America to be more productive to be able to compete. Economists (usually) agree that a country’s living standard is determined by how productive they are. The hidden benefit of the unfair trade may have resulted in the US having the greatest living standard of any country.
The trade war may benefit American businesses. But my guess is it will have a negative impact on the workers. Probably why Trump is engaged in it.
Mark:
Mexico is far poorer than the US and yet they cover healthcare at different levels. Generally, the US does not cover healthcare or provide insurance for Labor. You either have to be old or poor to get healthcare coverage. The former does have a cost. The latter is not accepted in every place.
The battle to compete is not Labor, it is overhead costs in the US. Companies pay for healthcare as well as other benefits for employees. US Labor is efficient and probably more efficient.
Fix the issues of Overhead. And have better tax policies.
Trump is already blaming bad economic news on Biden. Of course he is!
We flew over the Port of Seattle yesterday. The only cargo ship was a grain transport up at the Elliot Bay grain elevators. There was no other shipping visible after our takeoff from Boeing Field. There were no stacks of cargo containers. Even during peak COVID, it was never like this. I gather it’s similar down south in Los Angeles and Long Beach, and there are no ships en route. (I suppose I should check ATIS.)
On another note, has anyone considered that Trump and his flunkies are trying to save Social Security by lowering American life expectancy. If most Americans drop dead at 60, the system would be in great shape for a long, long time. Trump is dropping air and water quality controls, giving up on the war against cancer and every other disease, defunding Medicaid and probably Medicare in the near future, pushing against vaccines and so on. Has anyone run the numbers?
Kaleberg
April 20 to May 4, 2025
April 20
And then May 4 Forecast
Los Angeles Port
Kaleberg:
So much of what Trump says he is doing, or claims he did. or plans on doing is talk and bluster. We do know shipping dropped in LA and probably did in Long Beach also. However This article: In the wake of tariffs, cargo at the Port of LA is down 35% says they are down 35%. The charts show an increase weeks out.
Some twit claimed this will only benefit people who can afford Bentleys, Jaguars, Rovers and Minis. I own a Mini and Minis are not made in England: made in Germany. Minis are a BMW product, made in Germany, marketed as a cheap BMW. Rolls Royce and Mini are both owned by BMW. Bentleys are made by Volkswagen; Jaguar and Rover are owned by India Indian car company Tata Industries, don’t know where they’re made but their primary market focus is India
So, no, it doesn’t benefit me. I am in fact still waiting for parts from Germany to fix my Mini, six weeks after the tree fell on it. More than misdirection, the “trade deal” is three card monte …
I think it’s safe to assume you won’t be celebrating anything out of the Trump administration no matter how positive. LOL. I have yet to see one article posted here that resembles even a neutral stance on anything Trump related much less positive.
Matt:
And you will probably not see one sentence come from this site that is positive about the actions of this administration.
@Matt,
I think it’s safe to assume there won’t be anything worth celebrating out of the Trump Administration no matter how trivial. LOL. I have yet to see one thing that the Trump Administration has done that is even neutral, much less positive.
He must be the first president in history that is such a “disaster”, “the worst approval ratings in history” and every time he runs for president he gets more and more votes. That’s got to be a world record! LOL
@Matt,
LOL! Lots of bad presidents got elected. That’s why we call them presidents–they were elected.
Also too, Trump got more votes in 2020 than he got in 2016 and he still lost. And in 2024, he got fewer than half of the votes cast. So less than 50% approval.
Trump is the only president in US history to run three times and not get over 50% of the popular vote in any election.
LOL!
Matt:
In each case Herr Trump received less than 50% of the votes. Percentage wise he did not have a majority. Just so you know:

In 2016 there were 157 million eligible voters and in 2020 there were 168 million eligible voters. In 2024 174 million registered voters. Number of registered voters in the United States from 1996 to 2022