No, Mr. Trump, THIS is what a movement looks like
There it was. That familiar logo, the one I’d seen on so many lawn signs and bumper stickers in my (very) liberal small-city college town, and at the top of so many emails I’d received since early summer 2015. The logo with “Bernie” in sky blue, with a little star over the “I” instead of a dot, and the narrow wave of a sky blue line underlining it, with the similar line except in red under the blue one.
I’d checked my emails late last night and had seen the one from him. With a subject line reading: Yuuuge.
Below the familiar logo at the center top was this message:
Beverly: Since earlier today, 10,000 people have donated more than $400,000 to Catherine Cortez Masto, Deborah Ross, Maggie Hassan, and Katie McGinty.
That’s how much people want Paul Ryan’s warning about Bernie Sanders becoming chair of the budget committee to become true.
What you’re doing for these candidates is yuuuge. It’s game-changing for their campaigns. But there’s still more to do, because we can do more than just take back the Senate. We have a chance to take back the House. It starts with helping candidates for Congress who are inspired by the political revolution.
So we’re going to set an audacious goal that we don’t know is possible to hit by tomorrow night’s final FEC fundraising deadline – but it’s one that is very important to try to reach.
Let’s raise $1 million for candidates for the House and Senate by tomorrow’s final FEC fundraising deadline of the campaign. Split a contribution between Deborah Ross, Zephyr Teachout, Nanette Barragan, Tom Nelson, Pramila Jayapal, Rick Nolan, and Morgan Carroll.
Adding a contribution to these candidates – even if you’ve already supported them – is so important right now. Every poll shows these races within a handful of percentage points. And every contribution you make to these candidates will go to the critical work of communicating with voters and organizing for Election Day.
We don’t know if we can reach $1 million for House and Senate candidates tomorrow. But it’s very important that we try.
Adding a contribution to these candidates – even if you’ve already supported them – is so important right now. Every poll shows these races within a handful of percentage points. And every contribution you make to these candidates will go to the critical work of communicating with voters and organizing for Election Day.
We don’t know if we can reach $1 million for House and Senate candidates tomorrow. But it’s very important that we try.
If you can, add a contribution to reach our goal.
Thank you,
Jeff Weaver
Team Bernie
By this morning I’d forgotten about it. And anyway, I’d sworn that that donation I made last week to the DSCC during one of their triple-match drives was my absolute last campaign donation. Ever. Okay, I’d meant, in this election cycle. Which feels like ever. (I haven’t donated to Clinton.)
But then. There it was again. The logo. Bernie had emailed me again, this time with the subject: I hear you want me to have a gavel.
I do, so I’d clicked the message, which read:
Beverly,
I heard what Paul Ryan said about me: that if the Republicans lose the Senate, I will be the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee.
That sounds like a very good idea to me. It means that we can establish priorities for working people, and not just the billionaire class.
What would be equally exciting is if the Democrats took back the House, and Congressman Ryan was no longer Speaker. That would mean the clearest possible path to enact our agenda – the most progressive agenda of any party in American history.
In the last day, you have responded tremendously to our call to support four leaders who will help shift the balance of the Senate. More than 20,000 people have contributed more than $900,000 to ten candidates who are inspired by the political revolution.
During our campaign we pushed ourselves to reach goals that many thought impossible. That is why we set a very big, very audacious goal that we didn’t know if we could reach, but that we thought it was very important to try. But you’re about to smash that $1 million goal.
So, we’re going to need a bigger goal.
Let’s raise $2 million before tonight’s final FEC deadline of the campaign for candidates for the House and Senate. Can you start with a contribution between Paul Clements, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Deborah Ross, Zephyr Teachout, Morgan Carroll, Nanette Barragan, and Rick Nolan?
Consider for a moment the power that exists in the U.S. Senate. Right now, the Republican majority is using their power to block any meaningful action on addressing income inequality or climate change. In addition, without a Democratic majority the Senate is refusing to confirm federal judges and, incredibly, has left open a critical seat on the Supreme Court.
With a Democratic majority, we can change all of that. What Paul Ryan is specifically afraid of is the power of the budget committee. That committee defines the spending priorities of the entire government. The work of that committee says how much revenue the government should have, and where its money should go.
I have some thoughts on how the government should allocate its spending. I’m sure you do, too.
The first step to being able to enact our progressive agenda is taking back the Senate. And if we take back the House… well, the sky is the limit for what we can achieve.
Thank you for all you do.
In solidarity,
Bernie Sanders
Sigh. I’ll hate myself in the morning.
Here’s the link, folks. And, btw, a graphic inserted into the second email, sent at 2:10 this afternoon, shows that they’d raised $1,137,888. Since yesterday morning.
Beverly: You donated to DSCC? That means that some of your money went to such stellar “Democrats” as Patrick Murphy, Ann “don’t implement clean power” Kirkpatrick, Conner “deficit hawk” Eldridge, Chuck Schumer, and others too dismal to mention.
I prefer to donate only to individual candidates, with genuine progressive – or at least New Deal Democrat – credentials.
I, like Bernie, know that what matters by far the most is which party controls the Senate. My favorite candidate is Deborah Ross, who is a civil rights attorney. She’s slightly ahead, but will matter infinitely more in the Senate if she’s in the majority than if she’s not and McConnell is majority leader rather than Schumer.
So you’re damn right that I knowingly contributed to Murphy. I want him to beat Rubio. Etc. I want to see Bernie as Budget chairman, and Warren and Brown and Merkley and Ross with real control–the kind that matters–on the Judiciary Committee and the Banking Committee.
I keep thinking that one day liberals will start being able to add 2 + 2 and figure out the answer. Because their failure to do so is exactly what’s killing a progressive goals and perennially ensuring a continued stranglehold by the Conservative Movement. But so many liberals just don’t DO addition and subtraction, or anything other than preening about their purity.
Think Murphy or any of the others would refuse to vote to confirm progressive nominees to the federal bench? I don’t. But I sure would like to find out.
Yes you are supporting a movement all right in the wrong direction. Bigger government with more spending and more entitlements with more massive national debt will not create more jobs or stimulate the economy. It will only flat line the economy as it is already doing. We do not need more of the same socialism of where everybody gets and needs more government hand outs, higher taxes and nobody working. We need more capitalism and competition of world markets and capital where more people are working and paying into SS. Private sector corporate investment is critical to this but bigger government spending and debt of the Clinton-Sanders social movement will not do this. The Trump revolution will sail our economy and other policies in the right direction with out starting another war to sustain our economy as HRC will do. We do not need or want a leader who will rig everything in our government and economy as she is already doing through a shadow government of lies, deceit and deception will get us nowhere… I thought that young college educated women were smarter than that? Or is it just the women thing?
Bev,
Kudos for your reply to Bob.
Amazes me how people supposedly interested in our politics somehow lack the ability to read the Constitution and do basic math.