…of history the high court deems relevant (it varies). In the single most horrific case in the horrific term at the Supreme Court, gun rights zealots argued that a man…

…with the legal pundits who have said they expect that the Supreme Court will overrule the Montana Supreme Court. In Citizens United, the Supreme Court simply decided on its own…

…in state or local court proceedings, however flagrantly violative of even basic constitutional rights. For state-court criminal cases, these Supreme Court justices (not to be confused with justice; they’re justices,…

…the court are granted. See Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U. S. 1 (2006).” Purcell v. Gonzalez was a Supreme Court order, also handed down without briefing or oral argument. In Purcell, the federal…

…depends on respect for courts. But the courts have to act like courts. This Supreme Court is something else: a wielder of power that is increasingly constrained by nothing. Perhaps…

…awesome accomplishments, are Jeffrey Fisher, the head of Stanford Law School’s Supreme Court Clinic, and Robert L. Wilkins, an Obama appointee on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. Fisher is…

…the Supreme Court won’t even acknowledge it’s a problem.” “The Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act,” Durbin said, “would bring the Supreme Court Justices’ ethics requirement in line with…

…case—a long shot, in my opinion—this would do the trick. At least, that is, if the Supreme Court denied or postponed consideration of the petition for Supreme Court review of…

…His status in the United States was legal by court decision. Mark Joseph Stern @ Slate Jurisprudence, “Supreme Court analysis: Donald Trump CECOT plan runs into wall.” On Friday (May…

…Until now, Biden has lagged behind popular opinion on the issue of court reform. Now, though, the sitting president is rejecting the power the extremist modern-day Supreme Court conveyed on…