…… The Supreme Court is so much not supposed to create law, that Article 3, Section 2 of the Constitution even says that it must operate ‘under such Regulations as…

…for the information by January 13, 2023. The ideas of the Framers on the nature of government was also in the news today thanks to arguments before the Supreme Court…

…the commerce clause power, the court also treats Wickard v. Fillburn (the Supreme Court case that held that growing wheat for one’s own use is subject to the commerce clause…

A longer-than-planned post on today’s Supreme Court opinion on state-college-admissions affirmative action programs. (I’m up in Michigan’s Thumb region, sans cable and regular web service, and using my phone as…

…court (if such exists). The present legislation is little more than a back door correction of what happens and should not have happened in the first place during court proceeding….

…court and the Supreme Court. Furman pointed out, “when the Supreme Court announced last week it was taking up the case, “it knew that this Court had completed trial, and…

Law professor Eric Segall is a leading critic of the Supreme Court.  In a blog post today, he doesn’t pull any punches: The disaster that was the Trump v. United…

…OK. And sometimes you dissent. And that’s routine, not just for you but for every judge… SCHUMER: And every justice on the Supreme Court has dissented in many cases; meaning…

…the ultimate Establishment Republican. As will his Supreme Court and lower-federal-court nominees. As will his SEC, NLRB, Dept. of Justice, Treasury Dept., etc., etc., appointees. In the last 24 hours…

…to expire 286 days after the Supreme Court enters its judgment in the payday lenders’ case, which the Court is expected to do on June 17. As a result, the…