…a court has already ruled on an issue (say, on reproductive rights), the principle says future courts should decide similar cases the same way. Supreme Courts can change their minds…

…shift existed years before. Perhaps, it became more prominent now? There has always been a suspicion of bias. ~~~~~~~ “Supreme Court’s major shift towards the rich mapped out by experts,”…

…“I thought for sure that being able to go testify truthfully in court that I should be protected,” he said in an interview on the Supreme Court steps after Monday’s…

…of the Senate (very unlikely, in my opinion, but probably not in theirs), they will continue to refuse to allow hearings on a Supreme Court nominee to fill Scalia’s seat….

by Beverly Mann originally posted at the Annarborist Paul Clement, In Appreciation Each year as the Supreme Court’s term ends in late June, Slate’s main legal-issues writer, Dahlia Lithwick joins…

…physicians what they already k new, Depakote was a very valuable medication for “off-label” (unapproved uses). In the irony department, prescribing and administering Depakote for off-label uses is legal, and…

…information about products’ energy use. Label is voluntary, and Congress ordered it The Energy Star label is voluntary for products that meet certain efficiency levels, and differs from Department of…

…Court’s bow. Similar tactics could be used to pressure the Court in other ways. For example “When addressing statutory ambiguity and potential drafting errors, the Court shall interpret statutes to…

…the case argued today. The plaintiff, Edie Windsor, won in the trial-level court, and then in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. So if the Supreme Court dismisses the appeal,…

…actions. “Political” High Court Decision to Curtail Investor Rights May Also Free Criminals With Morrison, the Supreme Court “cavalierly overturned 40 years of precedent,” says former SEC commissioner and Brooklyn…