…order by the Supreme Court elicited the following response from Beverly Mann: “Eric M. Freedman, a law professor at Hofstra University, said that the lesson of the Supreme Court’s ruling…

…Article III, which creates the federal judicial branch, gives the federal courts the power to hear only certain identified types of “cases” or “controversies.” The Supreme Court has always interpreted…

In an email this morning, Bill H asked me whether I know much about a case called Harris v. Quinn, in which the Supreme Court will announce the likely 5-4…

…National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration rule. The court’s ruling overturned the principle known as Chevron deference. Laughable, the court’s six conservatives reasoned courts “routinely confront statutory ambiguities” that have nothing…

…from a DOJ inquiry. “Not only do presidents have absolute immunity from prosecution for violating the law, but now Supreme Court justices enjoy immunity for law-breaking, as well,” explained Fix…

…outcome is left to the courts due to close vote counts and various legal challenges; the case quickly is moved to the Supreme Court again to decide; Rehnquist is not…

…but it takes on a different force when it comes from a sitting Supreme Court justice. Gorsuch went on a monthslong publicity tour to promote the book in front of largely conservative…

…same court, we also have what appears to be two serious leaks of privileged court information. Roberts still has not commented on the leaks. What exists is a weak partisan…

…Instead, the Court held that it’s a tax for the purpose of raising revenue! Okay, the Supreme Court did not actually hold that the mandate fee is just a tax…

…Historically, the Supreme Court has only found in favor of businesses 41% of the time. More recently, when the court takes a case with a business on one side and…