…beyond business and political interests. It is The Story “US Supreme Court Votes to Cook the Planet by Limiting EPA’s Power,” Treehugger, Lloyd Alter To nobody’s surprise, the U.S. Supreme…

…labor violations. The Supreme Court appears to be weighing in on their decisions. The impact of the Supreme Court decision will weigh heavily on unions and labor. Five Appeals court…

…of the Supreme Court’s Courtroom, and national attention; it was evident that more was needed.  On cue, ‘Originalism’ was invented by Robert Bork (yup), with impetus from Brown v. Board…

…citizenship rules at all.” “Trump urges Supreme Court to decide whether to end birthright citizenship” SCOTUSblog Amy Howe The Trump administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on the…

…statute or court-created procedural or jurisdictional “doctrine” (e.g., a court-created rule that determines whether the federal courts have “subject-matter jurisdiction” to hear the case at all), until some zillionaire CEO…

…the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) in Moore v. Harper, a case that poses substantial peril for the higher court’s legitimacy. NCSC recently announced it would rehear a decision that…

…Rebecca Slaughter, which the FTC’s authorizing legislation and Supreme Court precedent — the aforementioned Humphrey’s Executor — forbid. He fired her anyway and she sued. Both the district and appellate court blocked…

…had a significant role in the packing of today’s federal bench with advocate judges/justices such as the six conservative members of the current supreme court. Before today’s supreme court, others,…

…dramatic change in the law by the Supreme Court. In 1990, in Employment Division v. Smith, the Supreme Court held that the free-exercise clause of the First Amendment cannot be…

…a matter arising from that claim. The Supreme Court later expanded the doctrine to require the lower federal courts to abstain from hearing constitutional challenges to a state court’s procedural…