Relevant and even prescient commentary on news, politics and the economy.

You searched for: label/Glass Steagall

Okay, so Douglas Holtz-Eakin thinks that proposing policies that have been proposed before but have not been adopted (or are no longer in force) is the same as proposing policies that have been adopted and are still in place. Seriously, he completely conflates the two.

…realize that the Republicans have settled on a tactic of pretending that Democratic economic policy proposals that either never were in place or that have been repealed (e.g., Glass-Steagall) or…

Greg Sargent gets it right: Clinton tried last night to return the definition of ‘progressive’ to the traditional ‘women’s-and-children’s’ issues that have been her calling card for decades. The pundits’ kudos notwithstanding, I doubt it will work, because ACTUAL progressives these days have a different idea.

…not that reinstate-Glass-Steagall thing, either. Sargent goes on to say: When CNN’s Dana Bash pushed Clinton by asking whether paid family leave programs would hurt small businesses, she pushed back…

Why does Clinton keep getting away with saying that gun manufacturers are the only industry in America that is immune from being held accountable for criminal acts by the purchasers of their products? Almost NO manufacturers are, by law, accountable for criminal acts by purchasers of their products. Someone should ask her to name one that is.

…book awesome-sounding book by John Kay, a professor at the London School of Economics and weekly Financial Times columnist, makes clear, near the reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall law nor the…

I finally agree with (much of) a Krugman criticism of the Sanders campaign. (And why I’m glad he made the criticism in the way he did.) [Clarification added 2/20 at 11:05 a.m.; update added 2/21 at 9:40 a.m.]

…anything Sanders is proposing. A period of organized-labor strength. Of Glass-Steagall separation of traditional banking and investment banking. And of aggressive enforcement of antitrust laws and securities laws. And, in…

Why did Paul Krugman and the Washington Post editorial board—both of whom know better—misrepresent that it was Sanders rather than the New York Daily News editorial board that was wrong about what Dodd-Frank provides, and about whether it would be Treasury or instead the financial institutions themselves that would determine the method of paring down?

…the Glass-Steagall-like law—should be devised by Treasury of the Fed of instead by the financial institutions themselves. And also about whether none other than Hillary Clinton, their candidate of choice,…