…assisting the Trump administration in “undermining the lower courts,” leaving district and appeals court judges “thrown under the bus.” The Supreme Court has an obligation to explain rulings in a…

…to ask. The California Supreme Court decides what the law is. That’s what we decide, right? We don’t prescribe law for the future. We — we decide what the law…

…U.S. Constitution, which states that when federal and state laws are at odds, federal law takes precedence. Its application to state tort litigation is a radical extension of its original…

…code that applies to the lower-court federal judges and that the law professors want made applicable to Supreme Court justices includes a prohibition against accepting travel reimbursements from outside groups…

…court and the Supreme Court. Furman pointed out, “when the Supreme Court announced last week it was taking up the case, “it knew that this Court had completed trial, and…

…commentators who actually know the law and follow the Court. Which, she says, wouldn’t surprise her all that much, because the case is not really about the law at all,…

…normalism began in 1991. Then Senator Joe Biden failed to block Clarence Thomas’s court nomination. The Democratic-controlled Senate confirmed him to replace civil rights hero Thurgood Marshall on the Supreme Court. That…

…doctrine under which the Supreme Court has stricken state laws prohibiting the sale and use of contraception and state laws prohibiting sodomy, and those categorically prohibiting abortion (Roe v. Wade)….

…court make!” Justices of the US Supreme court are charged with deciding on the basis of the law of the land, the constitution; itself, based on the laws of man….

…only $112. “This was an extremely expensive misunderstanding,” said his insurance broker Leslie Glogau. But really confusing is Kennedy’s reference, twice, to ACA-compliant plans bought through ACA exchanges as not…