This morning I overheard a part of a conversation between two 30-ish old high school friends, both from career-military families; their high school was on a military base. One is a disabled Marine veteran, having lost his right leg below the knee, significant muscle in his left leg, a good part of the movement in his right hand (he’s right-handed), and enough of his colon to wear a colostomy bag, when he stepped on an explosive during deployment in Afghanistan, ending his plan to be career Marine. During an earlier deployment in Iraq he watched as a friend of his was blown up by a suicide bomb in a car.
His friend was in the Navy for two years and then in a National Guard unit for several more.
Neither is a college graduate, although both of their wives are. At least one, the Navy vet, is a comedy-talk-radio devotee, which I think means right-leaning. Both of their families are decades-long Republicans.
Their conversation was about junk mail. The Navy vet, one of my neighbors (I live in a college town, but one that has a good number of military vets and a major veterans’ hospital, which makes for a nice mix, in my opinion), made some off-hand comment about it, which I didn’t hear. The disabled Marine vet responded, “Oh, yeah. It’s all that campaign stuff. I said to [I think he said, his mother, but I’m not sure], ‘Why would you want to be associated with a party that’s so awful?” His friend said, “Yeah.”
What struck me was the indictment of the party, not merely of Trump.
I was so glad to read this morning about Obama’s speech last night in Ohio, in which he indicted the Republican Party itself for Trumpism—a change from the tack he took in his convention speech in July. The purpose is to–finally–force Clinton to make a serious effort to swing control of the Senate and the House.
I also was struck by Paul Krugman’s column this morning, the purpose of which–notwithstanding its title, “The Clinton Agenda”—is to try to shift the discussion from the Clinton-Trump contest, whose outcome no longer is in doubt, but to which party controls Congress. Because which party controls Congress will determine whether or not federal policy shifts to what a large majority of Americans want—especially on climate-change-related law, but also on so much else on which there is broad public consensus.
The WikiLeaks-released emails from John Podesta seem to be largely-irrelevant history. They show the dismaying extent to which Clinton and her aides, other than Podesta, failed so completely, for so very long, to grasp the nature of this election cycle. But they continue to matter unless Clinton finally does recognize that most of the policies that progressives so care about—foremost, I believe, the policies (a.k.a., law) that the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts and federal agency heads will determine—are supported by the moderates she so fears reminding that she’s a Democrat, and who may decide to vote Democratic for Senate and House precisely on that basis.
Obama talked yesterday only about the Trumpian awfulness of the Republican Party itself—a subject that certainly deserved a speech all its own. But Clinton should pick up the fiscal and regulatory mantle from her biggest cheerleader pundit and campaign for a Democratic-controlled Congress. He says she’s done enough on that, but then belies that in the rest of his column.