by Mike Kimel
Libertarians Looking Vaguely in the Direction of Apostasy
Tyler Cowen is a prominent libertarian, a professor at GMU and Director of the Mercatus Institute. He is also on very, very dangerous ground. Lately he has had a couple of posts – the latest one here – that quote a new book by Alexander Fields. I haven’t read the book yet, but it seems to describe the 1930s as a period of great innovation despite pervasive misery.
But some of the passages Tyler quotes come tantalizingly close to noting that the economy was actually growing very rapidly by 1939. But what happens if he realizes it isn’t just after 1939, that real growth under FDR was faster than under any President since data has been collected – even if you leave out 1941 through 1945. See Figure 1 at this post. (Or that FDR was followed by LBJ, and then JFK, and then Clinton.) What if he takes a look at private investment during the New Deal era. What if he looks at the relationship between tax rates and economic downturns or comparison of growth rates between the “roaring 20s” favored by libertarian myth and the New Deal era?
Could a person really remain a libertarian if they realized things like that? Cowen has a lot at stake. I wonder if he’ll take the next step.
Note… Arnold Kling is also skating on the same ground. As of this writing, his readers, usually good for at least a few comments on every post, are stunned into silence.
Cross-posted at the Presimetrics blog.